Thesis

9 Appendix

Interview Protocol - Elected Officials and Professionals

This interview will be an hour long conversation about your thoughts on:

I have a list of guiding questions to ensure we cover the topics of interests. For context, my research focuses on land use and city planning, urban growth management and natural hazards mitigation.

Damage to residential homes has become a predictable outcome of major flood events in dense urban areas as well as the subsequent desire to move or be moved out of harm’s way. Relocation, as a flood mitigation strategy, is often achieved through the federal buyout program administered in the U.S. post- disaster and directly engages vulnerable development patterns through the removal of damaged or at- risk structures, resulting in publicly-owned, undeveloped floodable spaces. However, buyouts do not engage the question of where new, safer development can occur.

Specifically, I am investigating the possibility of using property exchanges as a relocation mechanism that not only helps assist residents struggling move out of harm’s way and/or stay in a city but also guides development to less hazardous areas of a city (in regards to flooding). The exchanging of private and public property has been loosely documented within context of post-flood recovery here in the US and has the potential to retain residents, revitalize neighborhoods and contribute to growth management goals of a city.

The purpose of this interview is to document perspectives on relocation out of the flood-prone areas being coupled with changes in land use across a city such as Houston, TX and to uncover insights on the perceived feasibility of property exchanges used for hazard mitigation.

Demographics

Let’s talk about your experiences with and perceptions of flooding in Houston.

Property acquisition has been a strategy for flood mitigation for decades. It removes vulnerable homes from hazardous areas, reducing potential future flood losses. Post-disaster, federally funded “buyouts” are the most common type of acquisition in the US for relocating households from flood prone areas and restoring open space/floodplains.

Buyouts of flood risk or flood damaged households are typically supported by paying homeowners the pre- or post-disaster market value of their home. This process has raised concerns about affordability and availability of housing in surrounding areas, the breaking up of communities and loss of local populations. At the moment, it is unclear what role city planning plays in this process.

There have been a few documented cases of local areas utilizing vacant land or vacant housing that is already in public ownership and making it available as destinations for residents looking to relocate. These efforts were generally driven by local interest in retention of current residents as well as incentivizing relocation out of flood prone areas.

As an example, a land holding authority, such as a local redevelopment agency or community land trust could open up their residential portfolio to residents interested in moving out of harm’s way but who are in need of a more structured relocation process. If the resident finds a desirable property, then the redevelopment authority can take possession of the resident’s flood-prone property and the resident can move into the previously vacant property in an area already identified as of reduced flood risk.

This use of exchanges has the possibility to not only result in public ownership of floodable areas and the reduction of future flood losses (similar to the current buyout process) but also expand the options for flood-driven relocation. Such a process could aid residents who may not qualify for or who have not been chosen through the buyout process but are still interested in relocation or residents who resist relocation because they are unsure of where they may end up or are “holding out”. On a greater scale, this process could restore open space where it is most needed and revitalize, repopulate and/or densify other less hazardous areas of the city (from a flooding standpoint).

Interview Protocol - Residents

This interview will be an hour long conversation about your thoughts on:

I have a list of guiding questions to ensure we cover the topics of interests. For context, my research focuses on land use and city planning, urban growth management and natural hazards mitigation.

Damage to residential homes has become a predictable outcome of major flood events in dense urban areas as well as the subsequent desire to move or be moved out of harm’s way. Relocation, as a flood mitigation strategy, is often achieved through the federal buyout program administered in the U.S. post- disaster and directly engages vulnerable development patterns through the removal of damaged or at- risk structures, resulting in publicly-owned, undeveloped floodable spaces. However, buyouts do not engage the question of where new, safer development can occur.

Specifically, I am investigating the possibility of using property exchanges as a relocation mechanism that not only helps assist residents struggling move out of harm’s way and/or stay in a city but also guides development to less hazardous areas of a city (in regards to flooding). The exchanging of private and public property has been loosely documented within context of post-flood recovery here in the US and has the potential to retain residents, revitalize neighborhoods and contribute to growth management goals of a city.

The purpose of this interview is to document perspectives on relocation out of the flood-prone areas being coupled with changes in land use across a city such as Houston, TX and to uncover insights on the perceived feasibility of property exchanges used for hazard mitigation.

Demographics

Let’s talk about your experiences with and perceptions of flooding in Houston.

Could you tell me about your experience with flooding in the city?

Property acquisition has been a strategy for flood mitigation for decades. It removes vulnerable homes from hazardous areas, reducing potential future flood losses. Post-disaster, federally funded “buyouts” are the most common type of acquisition in the US for relocating households from flood prone areas and restoring open space/floodplains.

There have been a few documented cases of local areas utilizing vacant land or vacant housing that is already in public ownership and making it available as destinations for residents looking to relocate. These efforts were generally driven by local interest in retention of current residents as well as incentivizing relocation out of flood prone areas.

As an example, a land holding authority, such as a local redevelopment agency or community land trust could open up their residential portfolio to residents interested in moving out of harm’s way but who are in need of a more structured relocation process. If the resident finds a desirable property, then the redevelopment authority can take possession of the resident’s flood-prone property and the resident can move into the previously vacant property in an area already identified as of reduced flood risk.

This use of exchanges has the possibility to not only result in public ownership of floodable areas and the reduction of future flood losses (similar to the current buyout process) but also expand the options for flood-driven relocation. Such a process could aid residents who may not qualify for or who have not been chosen through the buyout process but are still interested in relocation or residents who resist relocation because they are unsure of where they may end up or are “holding out”. On a greater scale, this process could restore open space where it is most needed and revitalize, repopulate and/or densify other less hazardous areas of the city (from a flooding standpoint).